Prosperous Period for US Billionaires: Why the Economic Structure Sustains Wealth Inequality
For many individuals in the United States, the financial landscape over the last half-decade has been difficult. Prices have escalated while pay remains flat. Steep mortgage rates have made homeownership a grim prospect. The jobless rate has been gradually increasing.
Many Americans have indicated they're delaying major life decisions, including starting a family or moving to new employment, because of financial volatility. But for a select few of people, the past five-year period couldn't have been more prosperous.
Fortune Expansion
The fortune of the world's billionaires expanded 54% in 2020, at the climax of the pandemic. And even amid all the economic instability, the stock market has only kept rising. This expansion has largely benefited just a limited group of Americans: 10% of the population controls 93% of stock market wealth.
However unequal as this distribution seems, it's the economic framework working as it is existing today.
"Rich elites have purchased their jets, they've acquired their multiple houses and mansions, but now they're acquiring senators and media outlets," commented wealth disparity expert Chuck Collins. "We're now entering this other chapter of hyper-extraction where the wealthy are preying on the system of inequality."
Analyzing Income Brackets
To help others understand what exactly it means to be "rich" in the US, Collins borrows a concept from journalist Robert Frank who, in a 2007 book on the rich, envisioned the different levels of wealth as "Richistan" villages: Prosperity Village, Lower Richistan, Middle Richistan, Upper Richistan and Billionaireville.
To contemporize the concept, Collins classifies these "affluence districts" based on income levels:
- At the lowest tier, Affluent Town, are the 10 million Americans who have a annual salary of at least $110,000 and an overall wealth of over $1.5m.
- The villages get more select as wealth goes up: Lower Richistan has 2.6 million households who have wealth between $6m and $13m.
- Middle Richistan has 1.3 million households who have assets worth an average of $37m.
- Upper Richistan, made up of 130,000 Americans (roughly the size of a small city) has between $60m to $1bn in wealth.
Collectively, the residents of these villages make up the top 10% of the wealth income distribution, about 14 million Americans altogether, though their lifestyles vary dramatically.
"You could be in Lower Richistan, and you're still traveling in the coach section of a commercial plane," Collins said. "Whereas in Upper Richistan, you're using a private jet. That's a really separate reality. You fly private, you have no investment in the commercial aviation system. You don't care if the whole system fails – you're set."
Ultra-Wealth Impact
The summit in "Richistan" is Billionaireville, which is made up of about 800 American billionaires who are some of the world's wealthiest. The influence that this group has substantially outweighs those who are simply well-off, let alone the average American who doesn't live in "Richistan" at all.
But Collins thinks the activist mantra "abolish billionaires" misses the point and has a "hint of elimination" to it.
"It's the separation between individual behaviors and a system of rules," Collins explained. "We should be concerned about an economic system that channels so much wealth upward to the billionaires."
Fortune Building Strategies
To understand how wealth at the billionaire level works, Collins divides it into four parts: getting the wealth, protecting assets, policy control and hyper-extraction.
When many Americans think about wealth, they usually think solely about the first step, Collins said. People can create a reasonable quantity of wealth through creating or operating a successful business, which could get them residency in Affluent Town.
But getting to Billionaireville requires significant resources and planning in those next three steps. Collins describes what he calls the "fortune security field": the tax lawyers, accountants and wealth managers who use their expertise to ensure that the super rich are being strategic about their taxes.
"Wealth defense professionals use a extensive selection of tools such as trusts, offshore bank accounts, undisclosed businesses, philanthropic entities and other methods to hold assets," he explains.
Government Power and Extreme Wealth Removal
To further a wealth defense strategy, a family needs government backing. Wealth of over $40m becomes political power, Collins says, and can be used to protect assets and protect its accumulation.
The last stage is a different kind of wealth accumulation, one that Collins calls "maximum taking" to describe how the wealthy have come to influence nearly every single part of an Americans' routine activities largely through private equity, which allows wealthy individuals to fund private companies.
"Private equity is searching for those sectors of the economy where they can squeeze things a little bit harder," Collins said. "One thing I don't think people comprehend is these billionaire private-equity funds are what happens when so much wealth is accumulated in so few hands, and they can kind of turn around and say, 'Where else can we extract profits out of the economy?' Healthcare? Great. Mobile home parks? These people can't go anywhere, [so] you can boost their expenses."
Tangible Effects
The results of this inequality go beyond the wealth getting wealthier. It's about people spending additional funds for their healthcare, rent and vet bills without seeing any significant salary growth. And Collins said the hardship and discontent of this kind of society can lead to deep discontent.
"The most powerful affluent rulers understand people are being marginalized [and] are economically suffering," Collins said, adding that conservative politicians have been good at accessing a potent "fake grassroots movement".
Political Reality
The paradox, Collins points out in his book, is that government officials have appointed a series of billionaires to cabinet positions. Along with tech billionaires who had brief but powerful roles overseeing significant decreases to the federal workforce, other important roles for commerce, treasury, education and the interior are also all billionaires.
This administrative framework, along with help from congressional allies, helped pass huge tax bills, which will make lasting reductions for the wealthy and corporations.
Future Solutions
While legislative bodies continue to argue that immigration and poor economic deals are the source of everyone's economic problems, "the issue remains: Will the alternative political group, which has also been influenced by the billionaires and big money, be able to seriously confront the underlying harms?" Collins said.
Liberal leaders, he argues, know what policies are needed to "alter economic flow", including deep changes to the tax system, raising the minimum wage and empowering worker groups.
"It was so, so close, and the law really did reflect the will of the majority of people who really want lawmakers to fix some of these pressing issues," Collins said. "Oligarchic power is not about creating so much as stopping. It's easier to block than it is to make something substantial take place, but the muscle memory is there. We know what that looks like."
Collins is optimistic that there can be change, but said it would require ongoing legislative effort.
"It may be before we know it that the tide turns, and then it really is about preserving a continuous public campaign to make progress on this extreme inequality we're living in," he said. "We can address this. It is solvable."